Racira Calculator

Investment Concentration Risk Calculator

Investment Concentration Risk Calculator

Portfolio & Positions
$
$
$
$
Effective Number of Positions
9.2
HHI 0.1087 · Broadly diversified · largest position 24.0% of the portfolio
Top Three Weight47.0%
50% Drop Impact12.00%
Trim to Target$70,000
HoldingValueWeightHHI Share50% Drop Cost
Largest position$120,00024.00%0.0576$60,000
Second position$70,00014.00%0.0196$35,000
Third position$45,0009.00%0.0081$22,500
Remaining 12 positions$265,00053.00%0.0234$132,500
Portfolio total$500,000100%0.1087$250,000
Summary Statistics
Portfolio Value$500,000
Largest Position$120,000
Largest Weight24.00%
Top Three Weight47.0%
Remaining Positions12 worth $265,000
Herfindahl Index0.1087
Effective Number of Positions9.2
Concentration VerdictBroadly diversified
Largest Position Down 50%12.00% of portfolio
Dollar Impact of That Drop$60,000
Largest Share of Portfolio Risk67.5%
Target Weight10.00%
Trim Needed to Target$70,000
Target Position Value$50,000
Remaining Weight53.00%
Largest Share of Top Three51.1%

What Is an Investment Concentration Risk Calculator?

An investment concentration risk calculator measures how much of your outcome depends on a handful of holdings. Position counts flatter a portfolio — forty holdings sounds diversified until you notice that three of them account for most of the value. The tool computes the Herfindahl index, converts it into the effective number of positions, and translates concentration into the two quantities that concentrate investors actually care about: the drawdown one bad holding would cause, and how much would have to be sold to bring the weight back to a target.

Concentration is normal. It is created by employee stock, by shares inherited or held for decades, by a founder who never sold, and by an old position that simply grew faster than everything around it. The risk is not that concentration exists, but that it exists without anyone having decided to accept it.

How It Works

The Herfindahl index sums the squared weight of each holding. Squaring is what makes the index superior to a simple weight count: a 25% position contributes 0.0625, four times as much as a 12.5% position even though it is only twice as large. The reciprocal of the index is the effective number of positions — the number of equally-sized, independent bets the portfolio genuinely resembles. In the default example the largest position is 24% of the portfolio, the top three are 47%, and the effective count is about 9.2 out of the fifteen holdings listed.

The drawdown figures follow directly from the weights. A 50% fall in the largest position costs 12% of the portfolio in the default example, and the table shows the same arithmetic for the second, third and remaining holdings. The trim figure compares the current weight with your target: selling the excess and reinvesting it elsewhere leaves the portfolio value unchanged, so the calculation is simply the current position minus the target weight multiplied by the total.

Risk contribution adds a second dimension. A concentrated holding is usually more volatile than the portfolio as a whole, and dividing the largest position's weighted volatility by the portfolio's volatility gives an upper-bound estimate of its share of total risk. When a holding is 24% of the value but roughly two-thirds of the risk, the portfolio is far more exposed than the weight suggests.

Understanding Your Results

The primary card shows the effective number of positions with the index, the verdict and the largest weight. The three statistics beside it give the top-three weight, the portfolio impact of a 50% fall in the largest holding, and the amount that would need to be sold to reach your target weight. Summary Statistics adds the dollar loss from that fall, the largest position's estimated share of portfolio risk, the remaining weight and the largest position's share of the top three.

A practical way to use the tool is to test reductions before making them: enter a lower target weight and watch the trim figure, then re-enter the portfolio as if the sale had happened to see the new effective count. The remaining decision is tax and timing rather than arithmetic — spreading sales across tax years, using charitable giving, or directing new contributions away from the concentrated holding so the weight declines without a sale.

Frequently Asked Questions

Related Calculators